PLD (SI) | Higher Court in Ljubljana 2016 | VSL0079577 (Q282)
From Product Liability Judgments Database
DESIGNATIONAL LAW - DEFENCE LAW - PROTECTION OF CONSUMERS - CIVIL PROCESS LAW - ORIGINAL LAW - Lack of reasons on the decisive facts - Lack of reasons on the rejection of offers of evidence - Substantial infringement of the provisions of civil proced
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | PLD (SI) | Higher Court in Ljubljana 2016 | VSL0079577 |
DESIGNATIONAL LAW - DEFENCE LAW - PROTECTION OF CONSUMERS - CIVIL PROCESS LAW - ORIGINAL LAW - Lack of reasons on the decisive facts - Lack of reasons on the rejection of offers of evidence - Substantial infringement of the provisions of civil proced |
Statements
VSL0079577
0 references
ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2016:II.CPG.694.2016
0 references
2016-07-14
(July 14th, 2016)
(July 14th, 2016)
0 references
Višje sodišče v Ljubljani
0 references
sl
0 references
sodnapraksa.si
0 references
Public
0 references
Judgment
0 references
Directive (EU) 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on liability for defective products and repealing Council Directive 85/374/EEC
1 reference
Product liability
0 references
Vesna Jenko
0 references
Ker tožena stranka sodišču prve stopnje ne očita, da nima razlogov o odločilnih dejstvih (tj. pravno relevantnih dejstvih v zvezi z (ne)utemeljenostjo zahtevka), temveč da nima razlogov v zvezi z zavrnitvijo dokaznih predlogov, bistvene kršitve določb pravdnega postopka iz 14. točke drugega odstaavka 339. člena ZPP ne more uspešno vsebinsko napolniti. Ob ugotovitvah, da sta bili bateriji dobri, da (Slovenian)
0 references
