PLD (SI) | Supreme Court 2011 | VS4001657 (Q293)

From Product Liability Judgments Database
Revision as of 09:20, 17 March 2026 by Wikibaseintegrator (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
DESIGN LAW - DEFINITION LAW - CIVIL PROCESS LAW - application for leave to appeal on a point of law - important point of law - compensation for improper performance - unlawfulness - material defect - business practices - allowed appeal on a point of
Language Label Description Also known as
English
PLD (SI) | Supreme Court 2011 | VS4001657
DESIGN LAW - DEFINITION LAW - CIVIL PROCESS LAW - application for leave to appeal on a point of law - important point of law - compensation for improper performance - unlawfulness - material defect - business practices - allowed appeal on a point of

    Statements

    VS4001657
    0 references
    ECLI:SI:VSRS:2011:III.DOR.100.2010
    0 references
    2011-02-02
    (February 2nd, 2011)
    0 references
    Vrhovno sodišče
    0 references
    sl
    0 references
    sodnapraksa.si
    0 references
    Public
    0 references
    Judgment
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Directive (EU) 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on liability for defective products and repealing Council Directive 85/374/EEC
    Product liability
    0 references
    Iz dejanskih ugotovitev sodišč nižjih stopenj sicer izhaja, da premočno zategovanje ventila v obravnavanem primeru ni bilo vzrok škodne posledice. Vendar pa je ostalo odprto vprašanje, ali je do loma ventila prišlo zaradi napake samega izdelka. Zato se izkažejo za pomembna vprašanja v zvezi z domnevno protipravno vgradnjo spornega ventila, za katerega predlagateljica zatrjuje, da ni bil dan v prom (Slovenian)
    0 references