PLD (SI) | Higher Court in Ljubljana 2015 | VSL0080656 (Q299): Difference between revisions
From Product Liability Judgments Database
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
| Property / Judgment File | |||
| Property / Judgment File: SI-VSLJ-2015-I.CPG.1438.2014.pdf / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 17 March 2026
DESIGN LAW - CONTRACTING LAW - CIVIL PROCESS LAW - contract for work - preparation of project documentation - product defects - result - omission of the obligation to explain - clerical error - exoneration from liability for damage - stand
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | PLD (SI) | Higher Court in Ljubljana 2015 | VSL0080656 |
DESIGN LAW - CONTRACTING LAW - CIVIL PROCESS LAW - contract for work - preparation of project documentation - product defects - result - omission of the obligation to explain - clerical error - exoneration from liability for damage - stand |
Statements
VSL0080656
0 references
ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2015:I.CPG.1438.2014
0 references
2015-09-23
(September 23rd, 2015)
(September 23rd, 2015)
0 references
Višje sodišče v Ljubljani
0 references
sl
0 references
sodnapraksa.si
0 references
Public
0 references
Judgment
0 references
Directive (EU) 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on liability for defective products and repealing Council Directive 85/374/EEC
1 reference
Product liability
0 references
dr. Marko Brus (preds.), Tadeja Zima Jenull (poroč.), Franc Seljak
0 references
Dogovor (pogodba) ni edini relevantni kriterij za presojo, ali je podjemnik naročilo izpolnil pravilno. Kadar pogodbenika ne uredita vseh značilnosti posla s pogodbo, mora podjemnik posel opraviti tako, da ima ta običajne lastnosti. Merilo za presojo pravilnosti podjemnikovega ravnanja pa so v vsakem primeru tudi pravila stroke. Nerelevantno je zato pritožbeno sklicevanje na dogovorjene obveznosti (Slovenian)
0 references
