PLD (SI) | Higher Court in Ljubljana 2018 | VSL00009529 (Q300)
From Product Liability Judgments Database
CIVIL PROCESS LAW - FORMATION LAW - CONTRACT LAW - court settlement - interpretation of the disputed provisions - contract for work - withdrawal from the contract - insignificant error - withdrawal at the will of the client - amount of payment - save
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | PLD (SI) | Higher Court in Ljubljana 2018 | VSL00009529 |
CIVIL PROCESS LAW - FORMATION LAW - CONTRACT LAW - court settlement - interpretation of the disputed provisions - contract for work - withdrawal from the contract - insignificant error - withdrawal at the will of the client - amount of payment - save |
Statements
VSL00009529
0 references
ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2018:I.CPG.1318.2016
0 references
2018-02-21
(February 21st, 2018)
(February 21st, 2018)
0 references
Višje sodišče v Ljubljani
0 references
sl
0 references
sodnapraksa.si
0 references
Public
0 references
Judgment
0 references
Directive (EU) 2024/2853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on liability for defective products and repealing Council Directive 85/374/EEC
1 reference
Product liability
0 references
Maja Jurak (preds.), Milojka Fatur Jesenko (poroč.), Lidija Leskošek Nikolič
0 references
Subjektivno dojemanje tožene stranke glede vsebine sodne poravnave pri njeni razlagi ni pomembno, zato pritožnica ne more doseči uporabe razlagalnega pravila iz drugega odstavka 82. člena OZ niti s sklicevanjem na to, da se je tudi njen zastopnik kot pravni strokovnjak ob sklepanju poravnave nedvomno zavedal, da je treba s poravnavo popolnoma urediti razmerja med strankama. Res je, da tožeča stran (Slovenian)
0 references
